BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSIGHTS

洞察前沿,连接科研新知

聚焦合成生物学、AI 靶点发现、临床队列与公共数据库,汇集最新论文摘要与原始出处
每 12 小时采集更新,经人工审核后发布。

前沿研究专业聚合持续更新
PAPER EXPLORER

发现热点论文

每 5 分钟更新缓存
全部共 47 篇
公共数据库基础研究Scientifica

Metformin Attenuates Glucose-Driven Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Targeting GPD2-Mediated Metabolic Plasticity.

暂无引用数据

高糖促进肝癌HepG2和Huh7细胞增殖与迁移,且不同于A549细胞,肝癌细胞在葡萄糖缺乏下仍维持生长,提示其代谢可塑性。GPD2在肝癌组织中显著上调并与不良生存相关。二甲双胍呈剂量依赖性抑制细胞增殖和迁移,低糖条件下作用更强;机制上下调Cyclin D1和XIAP、诱导Caspase-3剪切、降低EMT标志物Slug。GPD2与CCND1、SNAI2呈正相关,提示其与细胞周期及EMT信号相关。结论:肝癌细胞借助GPD2介导的代谢适应在限糖条件下维持生长,GPD2可作为预后生物标志物和治疗靶点;二甲双胍通过干扰GPD2相关促生存及EMT通路抑制肝癌进展。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

暂未整理

作者机构

暂未整理

技术路线

暂未整理

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

暂无引用数据

数据来源:暂未标注更新时间:暂无更新时间
公共数据库基础研究Immunotherapy

The potential of PDHA1 as a cuproptosis-related prognostic and immune biomarker in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

暂无引用数据

肺鳞状细胞癌(LUSC)中铜死亡相关基因研究尚不充分。本研究基于TCGA和GEO转录组及临床数据分析铜死亡相关基因,并评估丙酮酸脱氢酶E1亚基α1(PDHA1)的预后及生物学作用。结果显示,PDHA1在非小细胞肺癌中差异表达,LUSC中PDHA1高表达与较差总生存相关(HR=1.40),GEO数据趋势一致;PDHA1与致癌/免疫通路、免疫浸润、免疫治疗反应、RNA甲基化调节因子、干性、基因组改变及预测药物敏感性相关。在HCC95肺腺癌细胞中过表达PDHA1可增加集落形成、伤口闭合、改变细胞周期分布并增加异种移植瘤负荷。结论认为,LUSC中PDHA1高表达与不良预后及肿瘤相关分子/免疫特征相关,HCC95模型实验支持其初步促瘤关联,但将其作为治疗或免疫治疗反应生物标志物仍需免疫健全模型及前瞻性临床验证。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

暂未整理

作者机构

暂未整理

技术路线

暂未整理

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

暂无引用数据

数据来源:暂未标注更新时间:暂无更新时间
临床队列临床研究Nature medicine

Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy in resectable or borderline resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: the phase 2 MDT-BRIDGE trial.

0 次引用趋势数据不足

2期MDT-BRIDGE研究评估围手术期度伐利尤单抗联合新辅助化疗(AEGEAN方案)用于可切除及临界可切除非小细胞肺癌,并对新辅助化免疫治疗后经多学科团队评估转为不可切除者予以放化疗后度伐利尤单抗巩固(PACIFIC方案)。主要终点为总切除率(描述性,未作正式假设检验);次要终点包括无事件生存期、无进展生存期、可切除队列病理完全缓解率、基线至术前/放化疗前循环肿瘤DNA清除率及安全性。共142例接受新辅助治疗,基线可切除和临界可切除分别占64.8%和35.2%。总切除率(95%CI)为74.6%(66.7‒81.6),手术者R0切除率96.2%(90.6‒99.0)。131例(92.3%)在新辅助治疗后接受手术(106例)或放化疗(25例),117例(82.4%)接受辅助(94例)或巩固(23例)度伐利尤单抗。辅助或巩固度伐利尤单抗期间,手术患者和放化疗患者3/4级不良事件最高发生率分别为7.4%和17.4%,因不良事件停药分别为8.5%和13.0%。该多学科团队指导策略可行,使多数患者接受根治性治疗(手术或放化疗)后予以度伐利尤单抗,并显示初步疗效积极、安全性可控。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Martin Reck、Ernest Nadal、Carl M Gay、Nicolas Girard、Andrea Riccardo Filippi、Linda W Martin、Cordula Petersen、David A Cairns、Margarita Majem、Andrea Ardizzoni、Rosa Alvarez Alvarez、Andrew Robinson、Benoit Roch、Arnaud Boyer、Ilaria Attili、Maximilian Diehn、David Kurtz、Ugochinyere A Emeribe、Ignacio Diaz Perez、Matteo Giaj Levra、Davina Gale、Zhou Zhu、Nefeli Georgoulia、Jonathan Spicer

作者机构

  • Lung Clinic Großhansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Großhansdorf, Germany. m.reck@lungenclinic.de.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), IDIBELL, Bellvitge Healthcare Campus, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, Institut Curie/UVSQ, Paris, France.
  • Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR Sant Pau), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Hôpital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
  • Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  • AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  • AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • Department of Thoracic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

技术路线

数据/样本:142例可切除或临界可切除NSCLC患者接受新辅助治疗(64.8%可切除,35.2%临界可切除) → 分析:描述性主要终点总体切除率(74.6%,95%CI 66.7-81.6),R0切除率96.2%(90.6-99.0),并报告无事件生存、无进展生存、病理完全缓解率、循环肿瘤DNA清除及安全性

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/29 12:33
临床队列临床研究Nature medicine

Determinants of response to CAR T cell therapy in a multicenter, multi-trial cohort analysis of patients with lymphoma.

0 次引用趋势数据不足

一项多中心、多试验队列分析纳入580例接受抗CD19 CAR-T细胞疗法axicabtagene ciloleucel治疗的non-Hodgkin淋巴瘤患者,中位随访41.9个月,分析产品表型特征与疗效的关系。结果显示,naive-like(CCR7+CD45RA+)T细胞比例高是与无进展生存期延长相关的最显著特征(风险比=0.46,95%置信区间0.31-0.68,P=9.8×10⁻⁵,高比例组对低比例组),且不影响安全性。该关系独立于肿瘤微环境特征(112例评估)。多变量模型中,naive-like表型优于炎症标志物和肿瘤负荷等临床病理特征,校正产品扩增后仍显著。既往治疗线与产品和匹配单采样本中naive-like T细胞比例呈负相关,提示早期干预可能获益。关键发现在一个203例独立队列中得到验证。对116例亚组产品的质谱流式分析证实,缺乏TIGIT、LAG-3和PD-1等耗竭标志物表达的CD8 naive-like T细胞表型与无进展生存期相关。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Justin Budka、Madison Davis、Subing Cao、Jessica Ding、Jeremy Margaitis、Wangshu Zhang、Joshua Winters、Saran Vardhanabhuti、Yohei Arihara、Chad Williams、Soumya Poddar、Jerome Ritz、Mike Mattie、Priti Hegde、David M Barrett、Rhine Shen、Simone Filosto、Davide Bedognetti

作者机构

  • Kite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA. dbedognetti@kitepharma.com.

技术路线

数据/样本:多中心多试验队列,580例NHL患者接受axi-cel治疗(中位随访41.9个月),其中112例评估肿瘤微环境,116例产品行质谱流式分析,另203例独立队列(axi-cel为基础治疗或brexucabtagene autoleucel)用于验证 → 分析:分析产品表型属性(naive-like T细胞比例等),关联PFS与安全性;多因素模型比较naive-like表型与临床病理特征;分析既往治疗线与naive-like T细胞比例的相关性;质谱流式确认CD8 naive-like表型与PFS关联 → 验证:关键发现在203例独立队列中验证

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/29 12:34
AI 靶点发现基础研究Science (New York, N.Y.)

The Virtual Biotech: A multi-agent AI framework for therapeutic discovery and development.

5 次引用趋势数据不足

研究团队开发了“虚拟生物科技”(Virtual Biotech)系统,其以药物研发公司为原型组织多个智能体,可覆盖靶点发现、安全性评估、模态选择和临床开发。该系统在三个药物开发决策点得到应用:其一,超过37,000个智能体对55,984项试验的结果进行标注,发现靶向细胞类型特异性基因的药物进入市场的可能性高48%,不良事件少32%;其二,系统整合多模态证据,提出肺癌治疗策略;其三,系统分析一项终止的溃疡性结肠炎试验,推断可能的失败机制。结果表明,人类引导的多智能体可开展透明、多尺度分析,为治疗开发决策提供依据。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Harrison G Zhang、Peter Eckmann、Jiacheng Miao、Andrew B Mahon、James Zou

作者机构

  • Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • PHD Biosciences, La Jolla, CA, USA.

技术路线

多模态证据(55,984项试验) → 多智能体AI分析(37,000余个智能体标注、靶点发现/安全性评估/适应症选择/临床开发分部)

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/29 12:31
临床队列临床研究Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press)

Predictive Value of Combined Ultrasound Viscoelasticity Imaging, CEUS, AAPR, and PLR for Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Breast Cancer.

暂无引用数据

本研究评估联合超声黏弹性成像、超声造影(CEUS)、外周血AAPR及PLR预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效的价值。回顾性纳入105例局部晚期乳腺癌患者,按Miller-Payne病理分级分为主要组织学缓解组(MHR)与非主要组织学缓解组(NMHR),于NAC前获取黏弹性参数(Emax、Vmax)、CEUS参数(PI、TTP、MTT)及外周血炎症标志物,采用多因素logistic回归和ROC曲线分析预测效能。结果显示,MHR组HER-2阳性比例较高(P<0.05),Emax、Vmax、PI降低,TTP、MTT升高(P<0.001),PLR较低、AAPR较高(P<0.001);上述变量为独立影响因素(OR 0.288~8.232)。多模态模型AUC为0.945,敏感性89.71%,特异性86.49%,优于单一预测方法。结论认为,联合黏弹性成像、CEUS及外周血生物标志物有助于NAC疗效分层,尚需多中心大样本验证其普适性与临床实用性。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

暂未整理

作者机构

暂未整理

技术路线

暂未整理

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

暂无引用数据

数据来源:暂未标注更新时间:暂无更新时间
临床队列临床研究Nature medicine

Molecular predictors of minimal residual disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with quadruplet therapy.

0 次引用趋势数据不足

在新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)中,四联疗法(抗CD38抗体、免疫调节药物、蛋白酶体抑制剂和地塞米松)已成为标准诱导治疗,但疗效异质,亟需分子预测标志。研究对MIDAS队列423例NDMM肿瘤样本进行基因组、转录组和表观基因组整合分析,评估其与Isa-KRd四联诱导后可测量残留病(MRD)的关联。结果显示,诱导后MRD阴性率在不同基因表达亚型间差异显著,HP1/HP3和MS组优于MF和CD2亚型;B细胞分化与MRD阳性相关,增殖和MYC程序与MRD阴性相关,并在CASSIOPEIA队列独立验证。全基因组测序揭示已知和新的基因组不稳定表型及驱动改变,并在三个外部队列(共1 451例)验证;CCND1、MYC等驱动基因及基因组不稳定特征与MRD结局相关。DNA甲基化分析识别出9个MRD相关亚组。整合多组学特征的随机森林模型预测诱导后MRD状态,曲线下面积为0.77,优于临床和基因组模型。研究建立了与Isa-KRd疗效相关的NDMM多组学分类。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Florence Magrangeas、Mia Cherkaoui、Victor Bessonneau-Gaborit、Jennifer Derrien、Céline Chevalier、Catherine Guérin-Charbonnel、Benjamin Diamond、Mehmet Kemal Samur、Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM)、Cyrille Hulin、Denis Caillot、Lionel Karlin、Bertrand Arnulf、Ola Landgren、Nikhil C Munshi、Hervé Avet-Loiseau、Ludovic Martinet、Jill Corre、Aurore Perrot、Philippe Moreau、Cyrille Touzeau、Stéphane Minvielle、Eric Letouzé

作者机构

  • Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France.
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.
  • Myeloma Division, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Department of Data Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Service d'Hématologie, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Service d'Hematologie, Pierre-Benite, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
  • Immuno-hématologie, Hôpital Saint Louis, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Service d'Hématologie, Toulouse, France.
  • Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France. stephane.minvielle@univ-nantes.fr.
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. stephane.minvielle@univ-nantes.fr.
  • Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France. eric.letouze@gmail.com.
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. eric.letouze@gmail.com.

技术路线

423例NDMM肿瘤样本(MIDAS队列)→整合基因组、转录组和表观基因组分析→MRD关联特征在CASSIOPEIA队列独立验证;全基因组测序发现基因组不稳定表型在MMRF队列验证;驱动改变在MMRF、MANHATTAN和CASSIOPEIA三个外部队列(1,451例)独立验证;多模态随机森林模型预测MRD状态,AUC为0.77,并与临床、基因组、转录组和表观基因组模型比较

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/29 12:34
AI 靶点发现基础研究Cancers

Machine Learning-Guided Virtual Screening Identifies a Novel MELK-Targeted Antiproliferative Lead Compound with G2/M Arrest Activity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells.

暂无引用数据

本研究以细胞周期调控丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶MELK为靶点,构建整合随机森林、梯度提升、XGBoost和LightGBM四种机器学习回归模型,结合分层Glide对接、MM/GBSA重打分、ADMET预测及100 ns分子动力学模拟的计算流程,从约1558万化合物库中筛选出12个候选物。对CPD4、CPD6、CPD10进行抗增殖评价,CPD6活性最强,在MDA-MB-468和H1299细胞中IC50分别为1.44 μM和1.66 μM,略优于同条件下对照药MELK-8a(2.48 μM和2.51 μM)。细胞裂解液热位移实验提供MELK结合证据,分子动力学模拟支持其结合模式,底物磷酸化及MELK过表达回补实验进一步支持MELK依赖性抑制活性。克隆形成、EdU掺入和细胞周期分析显示剂量依赖性抗增殖及G2/M期阻滞,伴CDC25C、CDK1和Cyclin B1下调。CPD6为结构新颖的MELK先导化合物,在TNBC和肺腺癌模型中具低微摩尔抗增殖活性,但尚需激酶组选择性分析。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Wanxin Cao、Bin Jiang、Xiangyin Chi、Wan Li、Hong Yang、Xiaoxue Li、Yuxuan Zhao、Xu Zhang、Rui Meng、Yanyu Cang、Guanhua Du、Jinhua Wang

作者机构

  • Beijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery and Polymorphic Druggability Research for Cerebrovascular Diseases, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China.
  • School of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 117004, China.
  • School of Pharmacy, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
  • Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China.

技术路线

暂未整理

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

暂无引用数据

数据来源:暂未标注更新时间:暂无更新时间
临床队列临床研究Nature

Divergent genomic evolution in astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.

0 次引用趋势数据不足

一项发表于《自然》的研究利用全基因组和全外显子组测序,对胶质瘤纵向分析联盟收集的183例IDH突变型胶质瘤患者的纵向肿瘤标本进行了分析,多数原发手术样本组织学分级为2级(星形细胞瘤73%,少突胶质细胞瘤93%)。研究验证了肿瘤进展的已知基因组标志物,包括超突变及CDKN2A/B纯合缺失,并发现星形细胞瘤与少突胶质细胞瘤的演化轨迹存在差异:复发性少突胶质细胞瘤新获得PI3K和NOTCH1突变,与肿瘤突变负荷增加相关;复发性星形细胞瘤则获得局灶性癌基因扩增和CDKN2A/B纯合缺失,与染色体失衡增加相关,并伴随染色体碎裂和全基因组加倍等标志。两类肿瘤均出现获得性改变与全基因组变化的趋同及患者预后恶化,提示治疗难治性克隆被选择。替莫唑胺治疗与SBS11和SBS119突变特征相关,放疗相关ID8特征仅在星形细胞瘤中增加。研究表明,两类肿瘤基因组以不同方式适应肿瘤进展和治疗的选择压力。

为什么值得关注

编辑短评

该研究基于183例IDH突变胶质瘤纵向标本,通过全基因组/外显子测序揭示星形细胞瘤与少突胶质细胞瘤在进展和治疗压力下的基因组演化差异,并验证已知进展标志物。样本量较大、纵向设计及治疗相关突变特征分析增强了发现的可信度。但摘要未报告具体效应量、统计显著性及独立验证队列,结论的普适性仍需进一步确认。

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Tamrin Chowdhury、C Mircea S Tesileanu、Emre Kocakavuk、Kevin C Johnson、Joo Ho Lee、Zeynep Erson-Omay、Chaewon Heo、Kenneth Aldape、Samirkumar B Amin、Kevin J Anderson、David M Ashley、Floris P Barthel、Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan、Daniel J Brat、Andrew R Brodbelt、Ana Valeria Castro、Elizabeth B Claus、Jennifer M Connelly、Joseph F Costello、Indrani Datta、Carol Elliott、Gaetano Finocchiaro、Pim J French、Hui K Gan、Luciano Garofano、Padmaja L Ghospurkar、Anna Golebiewska、Pranav S Gundla、Beth Hermes、Chibo Hong、Youri Hoogstrate、Craig Horbinski、Jason T Huse、Antonio Iavarone、Cihat Karadag、Mustafa Khasraw、Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven、Peter S LaViolette、Kay Li、Allison Lowman、Katy McCortney、Hyo-Eun Moon、Nader Sanai、MacLean P Nasrallah、H K Ng、D Ryan Ormond、Bethany Kwan、Marta Padovan、Sun Ha Paek、Laila M Poisson、Sushant Puri、Erica Shen、Shwetal Mehta、Andrew E Sloan、Wies R Vallentgoed、Erwin G Van Meir、Rachael Vaubel、Taylor E Wade、Annemiek M E Walenkamp、Colin Watts、Tobias Weiss、Michael Weller、Pieter Wesseling、Kerryn Westcott、Bart A Westerman、Gordon Y Ye、W K Alfred Yung、GLASS Consortium、Frederick S Varn、Roel G W Verhaak

作者机构

  • Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  • Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Department of Neurology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
  • Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Cancer Therapies and Biology Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
  • Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Department of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Department of Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Research Institute, Hypoxia/Ischemia Disease Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ivy Brain Tumor Center at the Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon-si, Republic of Korea.
  • Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Neurological Institute, Premier Health and Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA.
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Cancer Genome Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • VUmc, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, VUmc, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA. frederick.varn@jax.org.
  • Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA. frederick.varn@jax.org.
  • Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. frederick.varn@jax.org.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. roel.verhaak@yale.edu.

技术路线

['数据/样本:183例IDH突变型胶质瘤患者的纵向收集肿瘤标本(来自GLASS联盟)', '分析:全基因组测序和全外显子组测序,表征纵向标本的遗传驱动因素;验证已知进展基因组标志物(超突变、CDKN2A/B纯合缺失),发现区分星形细胞瘤与少突胶质细胞瘤演化轨迹的遗传改变;分析获得性改变、全基因组变化与患者结局的趋同;关联治疗(替莫唑胺、放疗)与突变特征', '验证:验证已知基因组标志物(超突变和CDKN2A/B纯合缺失)']

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/30 06:02
临床队列临床研究Nature

Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical phenotyping of human brown fat.

1 次引用趋势数据不足

人工智能赋能的人类棕色脂肪临床表型分析。脂肪组织在全身能量平衡及肥胖及其并发症的发病机制中发挥核心作用。与白色脂肪组织不同,棕色脂肪组织(BAT)利用能量产热。人体可检测到的BAT与心血管代谢疾病患病率降低相关,但BAT相关的完整健康状态谱仍不明确,且缺乏高通量量化人体BAT活性的方法。本研究利用大数据和人工智能,在来自大型癌症中心的101,243例患者队列中系统定义BAT的临床影响。无偏分析显示,在所有诊断中,心血管和精神疾病在BAT阳性人群中患病率较低。采用机器学习方法对约8,700例患者的BAT活性进行半自动量化,发现较高的BAT活性(尤其是腋窝部位)与心血管代谢疾病风险降低及更健康的白色脂肪分布相关。BAT阳性者还表现出更有利的血糖参数、血脂谱、炎症标志物和超声心动图指标。用药分析显示,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂使用与BAT存在正相关。概念验证表明,氯沙坦可增加棕色脂肪细胞活性和全身能量消耗。综上,本研究利用人工智能和大数据识别了与BAT相关的新临床表型,并为靶向激活该组织的药物重定位提供了平台。

为什么值得关注

暂未整理

查看扩展信息

完整作者

Nicolás Gómez-Banoy、Jorge A Barrero、Luiza Rachel Pinheiro de Carvalho、Caroline S Jiang、Tara Doma Lama、Nakul Karandikar、Mascha Koenen、Tiffany Lam、Kaja Plucińska、Ksenia Morozova、Stephanie Chahwan、Gustavo Barraza、Burcin Agridag Ucpinar、Jennifer E Liu、Rohit Sharma、Daniel Lafontaine、Heiko Schöder、Paul Cohen

作者机构

  • Laboratory of Molecular Metabolism, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Laboratorio de Lípidos y Diabetes, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Metabolic Phenotyping Center, Core Laboratories Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, NY, USA.
  • Laboratory of Tissue Dynamics and Organ Crosstalk, Helmholtz Institute for Translational AngioCardioScience (HI-TAC) of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association at Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Department of Medicine, Cardiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Laboratory of Molecular Metabolism, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. pcohen@rockefeller.edu.

技术路线

大数据队列(101,243例患者) → 无偏分析及机器学习半自动量化BAT活性(约8,700例)

最近 5 个完整年度引用趋势

0110202102022020230202402025

不含 2026 年,仅展示最近 5 个完整年度。

数据来源:openalex更新时间:2026/10/30 06:02
页